Hot blast operation involves
preheating the cupola blast air and was originally conceived as a means of
reducing coke consumption. It was first adopted for foundry use in the late
1940s, early 1950s and by heating the blast air to about 500ºC, charge coke reductions
of about 30% were experienced compared to cold blast operation. However, hot
blast could also be employed to increase metal temperatures and carbon pick-up
and this permitted the use of more steel scrap in the charge mixture.
The advantages of hot blast
operation may be summarised as follows:
reduced coke consumption
increased metal temperature
higher melting rate
reduced sulphur pick-up
lower melting losses of silicon
increased carbon pick-up.
It is not possible to obtain all
of these benefits simultaneously.
Hot blast cupolas have not been
universally used in all European countries but have been very popular in
Germany. In many countries initial environmental legislation was more stringent
for hot blast cupolas than for cold blast. This is not the case now and the
cost of the recuperator is relatively easy to justify on operating cost
savings.
Most hot blast cupolas are
operated on long campaigns, many with externally water cooled unlined shells in
the melting zone. Several of this type of furnace have been used for the
production of low sulphur ductile base iron using basic slags.
Blast heating has been carried
out using both independently fired and recuperative hot blast systems. However,
the high fuel costs and generally poor performance of the independent units has
resulted in recuperative systems incorporating combustion of the cupola
off-take gases being the most common arrangement.
In recent years there has been an interest in the use of
higher blast air temperature in excess of 700ºC. Such very high blast
temperatures will result in further enhancement of recarburisation of the iron,
while the lower blast rates for a given melt rate and the higher bed
temperatures should allow the use of smaller charge pieces such as borings to
be successfully melted. It has been suggested that superheated hot blast
systems will allow lower grade, smaller coke to be employed without the tapping
temperature decrease, which would be experienced with conventional cupolas.
Oxygen Enrichment
Although the benefits of oxygen
were known for a considerable time, it was only in the 1970s when the costs of
bulk oxygen, pig iron and coke were such as to make its employment economical
that it came into common use.
Compared with conventional
operation, the continuous use of oxygen resulted in:
higher metal temperatures and carbon pick-up and lower silicon losses at the
same coke levels – allowing metallic charge costs to be reduced by pig iron
replacement and a reduction in silicon additions
reduced
coke consumption for a given temperature
improved tapping temperature
recovery at a start of melting or following shutdown periods.
The oxygen could be introduced
by three different processes – blast enrichment, tuyere injection, or well
injection – in order of increasing effectiveness. However, blast enrichment was
simpler and the majority of cupolas adopting oxygen technology employed this
system.
More recently, the use of
supersonic oxygen injection into cupolas via the tuyeres is becoming an
accepted technique and a number of cupolas in Europe have installed such
facilities. In this process the tuyere lance nozzles are specially designed to
provide an outlet velocity in the range 2–2.5 Mach. It is claimed that this
approach results in better oxygen and air blast penetration with a consequent
improvement in coke bed temperature.
The injection lances are
self-cooled by gaseous oxygen and are mounted centrally in each tuyere
(generally tuyeres are water cooled) at a distance of between 100 and 300 mm
from the exit. It is claimed that the following effects result:
blast volume is reduced
blast air/oxygen distribution is more uniform and furnace internal pressure is
reduced
heat losses from cupola are reduced due to more even coke bed combustion
charge preheating is improved because there is less temperature variation over
the cross-section of the cupola
charge coke additions are reduced
melting rate variations of
-50% to +40% of nominal melting rate are possible
· furnace
shell losses are lower as higher temperatures are achieved in the centre of the
cupola
metal
tapping temperature is increased
silicon losses are reduced
the blast temperature on hot blast cupolas is increased by the higher off-take
gas temperature.
It is also claimed that the
process is the first oxygen method which demonstrates a reduction in coke
consumption at a constant melting rate such that coke savings fully compensate
for the cost of oxygen. It is further suggested that it should be possible to
use lower grade coke with consequent further cost savings.
Long Campaign Cupolas
In recent years there has been
considerably increased interest in operating cupolas for extended periods, both
on a daily basis and also from a refractory campaign point of view (repair
after weeks rather than after melting day).
Obviously the well-established
hot blast technology already discussed in an earlier section can fulfil this
role successfully, However, largely as a result of work in the USA, a number of
cold blast units has been adopted for the same purpose.
The cold blast furnaces include similar features to those
found in hot blast plants in that the cupola shells (which may be lined or
unlined) are fully water cooled and are fitted with water cooled projecting
tuyeres. Tuyere blast velocities are considerably higher than conventional cold
blast practice to ensure complete penetration of the coke bed, the generation
of very high bed temperatures and a minimisation of heat losses, particularly
through an unlined shell.
No comments:
Post a Comment